Wednesday, June 3, 2026 music production

Your go-to source for insightful music industry analysis

The Beatles original audition tape - is it a fake?

By · · 13 min read

The Beatles original audition tape - is it a fake?

From Home Recording Studio to PRO Recording Studio!

Home|Ask a Question)|Make Your Own Artist/Band Page on Record-Producer.com)

  

The Beatles original audition tape - is it a fake?

The tape that got The Beatles rejected by Decca Records in 1962 has unexpectedly been rediscovered. But is it just a (money-making) fake?

By David Mellor, Course Director of Audio Masterclass

According to an article in the Daily Mail and elsewhere, The Beatles’ original audition tape for Decca Records, made in 1962, has been rediscovered after having lain dormant among a collection of memorabilia.

Clearly this recording of ten songs will be of significant interest to Beatles fans, and to whoever is willing to pay possibly £30,000 or more at auction.

But I have to ask the question whether this tape is genuine. It may be a complete fake, or it may be a copy of the original tape.

The reason I wonder is that the spool and box pictured are most definitely not of 1962 vintage. I am absolutely certain that this style of spool was not introduced by Ampex until at least the mid 1970s. A more dedicated enthusiast of recording history may be able to date it more precisely. I further wonder whether Decca would have used a US brand of tape when UK-manufactured tape was available and import duties were high.

I even question the writing in what seems to be felt-tip pen, the modern version of which was only introduced in 1962 and was not in common use until later in the 1960s.

Then there is the discrepancy between the outside of the box that states ‘stereo 1/2 tk’ and the label inside that states ‘2 track mono’. Decca engineers would not have allowed any confusion to arise over whether the recording was mono or stereo. If the recording was made in stereo (which it could have been in 1962) then it would indeed be stereo half-track. ‘2 track mono’ could make sense as it might refer to a mono recording made on a stereo machine with identical signals going to both tracks. Playback would be a little less noisy on a similar machine rather than on a full-track mono machine that would also pick up noise from the guard band between the tracks.

Of course, it may be that the tape itself is the original, wound onto a different spool and placed in a different box. And even if it is a copy of decent quality then it will certainly make interesting listening.

P.S. One more point - The Dolby noise reduction system was not available until 1965, and the Dolby tone (as mentioned on the inside label) introduced even later!


Note on copyright: As a news item specifically about the appearance of this item, fair use is claimed in respect of the photographs.

Publication date: Sunday November 25, 2012
Author: David Mellor, Course Director of Audio Masterclass

Tweet

Discussion on this topic…

Arthur, Baltimore, USA

What a joke?? The real story behind the Original Decca tape, is that Joe Pope, who had a Beatles Fan Club..”Strawberry Fields Forever”,bought the original from Allen Carr.Joe Pope issued Boot colored vinyl 45’s,two tracks at a time,for his club members.All were on 45’s except “Take Good Care Of My Baby”,which was put on the Boot LP’The Decca Tapes” if you have that one, it’s good, being that the tape used for that, is one away from Joe Pope’s master.Don’t know where this fake tape their pushing, comes from.But it IS a fake..
Monday November 26, 2012

Ron Macpherson, Boston, Ma

It’s a fake! The bootleggers record number is on the tape box BSR-1111. The “BSR” is for Backstage Records which put out an abridged bootleg sometime in 1982 or 1983, long after the songs were first distributed in the late 70’s. This tape is at best 4th generation removed from the Decca original. The original Decca master is either lost, destroyed or missing in their vaults. Brian’s Epstein’s tape copy was the source of the boots in the 70’s. Apple/EMI used THAT source on Anthology 1. REM
Saturday November 24, 2012

Larry, Fort Collins, Co, USA

Terribly unprofessional for someone to have written “Sivler Beatles” on the box …
Friday November 23, 2012

Norwood, Ny, USA

Guy’s that’s the tape for the ‘Dawn of the Silver Beatles’ album that came out in 1980.
Friday November 23, 2012

Robert Golden, Bakersfield CA, USA

It doesn’t seem right to me. I wouldn’t want to be the person that buys it.
Friday November 23, 2012

Phil Norris, Stroud, England

I agree, the ‘Copy’ is probably a fake, that it should surface over 50 years after it was recorded in what looks like a very new condition is very suspect. Also on my cd of the ‘Decca Tapes’ there are 15 tracks, only 10 seem to be listed here? I would’nt pay more than 30p for this tape, let alone
£30, 000!!
Beatles Fan - Phil Norris
Friday November 23, 2012

We welcome your addition to the discussion on the topic of this article. If you feel that the article is inaccurate in any way, please let us know by e-mail at [email protected]. We read all messages sent to this address but we cannot promise a reply.
 
You don’t need an account to post :-)

Your name: Your e-mail address (will not be published): Your town: Your country: Your website (promote yourself!): http:// Share your comments on this topic… (No links please. Allowing links invites comment spam in thousands.
We suggest you use search terms instead.)

Record-Producer.com reserves the right to select readers’ comments for publication.

Q: If I filter out low frequencies, can I get them back again later? I have heard that it’s good to filter out low frequencies on all but bass instruments. But what if I record everything like that and change my mind later? Read more…

Q: How can I work on my voice? It’s a simple question, but the answer is both simple and complex at the same time. Read more…

New music: Feeling Christmassy by The Christmassy Guy The Christmassy Guy explains how he wrote and recorded a new Christmas song with minimal instruments and equipment. Hear the song and see the video! Read more…

Q: I’m converting audio from 16-bit to 24-bit. Should I worry? A Record-Producer.com reader is importing 16-bit audio into a 24-bit session. He is concerned whether there will be any quality loss. Read more…

The famous $5 preamp - everything you need to know Some time ago we published an article about a preamp that cost less than $5, yet was judged to sound better than other preamps costing MUCH more. Here we present the original articles, with our additional commentary. Read more…

Why copyright is bad for music (apparently) ”) Copyright might be good for a few rich musicians, but is it good for music? In this video, we see how not having copyright might actually be the best thing for music perhaps since notes were invented. Read more…

Should your music be more organic? The food you eat is mostly factory farmed - grown in chemicals manufactured in a chemical works. But is your music ‘factory farmed’ too, and does it sound like it? Read more…

Should your loudspeakers have digital inputs? An RP visitor enquires whether the Genelec 8240A with digital inputs and DSP is suitable for the home recording studio. Hmm… Read more…

Prince gives away CD, it isn’t for sale, it isn’t online! The artist known as Prince is giving away his new CD. You can’t buy it in the shops, you can’t buy it online. So in which universe does this make commercial sense? Read more…

Cor blimey! George Martin is a Cockney! Would you Adam and Eve it? George Martin, producer of The Beatles, is posher than the Queen of England. So who would have thought he was once a Cockney? Read more…

Q: I have a problem with dust. Should I just grab a duster once a week? A RecordProducer.com reader has a dust problem. But is it really a problem or can you live with it? Read more…

“Used” by The Botanists This band is a one man operation. All songs are written, performed, and recorded by one guy (Tom Saunders)… Read more…

Q: What equipment do I need to set up a home recording studio? What basic equipment should I buy to set up a home studio and as well for industry or for a business? Please I need a list for both Read more…

How do you record a singer with poor microphone technique? You’re trying to get a decent recording, but your singer is doing really strange things with the microphone. What do you do? Read more…

What is the nastiest equipment you have ever had? The range of great home recording equipment available these days is truly superb. But occasionally we all buy something that just wasn’t worth the money. What’s your experience? Read more…

Mix Michael Jackson’s multitrack masters in your own studio? There’s a new software around that could be the savior of the music industry. And you can get your hands on some amazing original multitrack recordings too! Read more…

When should you use Auto-Tune, and when should you avoid it like the plague? Auto-Tune is a powerful vocal tuning software. It can turn an out-of-tune vocal track into a pitch-perfect pro performance. But are there times when you would be better off not using it? Read more…

Loudspeakers: Know your continuous from your program from your peak The power rating of a loudspeaker might be 500 watts; it might be 2000 watts. But how much power can it truly handle? Read more…

Parallel compression: Finding excitement in the lower levels The ear and brain pay much more attention to high-level sounds than low. So if you can bring up the low levels you might find a new source of excitement in your audio. Read more…

Why distortion techniques MUST be part of your recording vocabulary Do you hate over-mastered, distorted recordings? That might just be why your work isn’t selling. Read more…

 

Record-Producer.com aims to inform, educate and entertain home recording studio owners and budding record producers. Topics include techniques, equipment, musicianship, science, studio building, production, music business and more.

Our website uses cookies to enable the site to function, and to function in a way that helps us serve our visitors. We use cookies to help improve the site and for advertising purposes. If you would prefer not to receive our cookies, please do not use the site. If you do not know what a cookie is, please do not use the site.

Terms of use of this website: We aim to inform, educate and entertain. You may not rely on any information contained in our website, newsletter, information products or e-mail messages but use your judgment and take responsibility for your own actions. Any communication with us may be edited and republished in our website, newsletter, information products or e-mail messages. If you do not wish your communication to be published, you must clearly state “Not for Publication”. If you submit audio material to us, then by the act of submission you grant us a non-exclusive, non-time-limited, worldwide licence to publish that material on any associated websites, newsletters, information products or e-mail messages. Comments on articles are the full responsibility of their respective submitters. Not all comments are published. Comments may be removed after publication. All site contents © David Mellor 1986 - 2012 and the respective copyright owners of certain articles, images, audio and video. Record-Producer.com, 114 High Street, Tetsworth, Thame OX9 7AE, United Kingdom.

Site map… | Google+

Related reading

Join Our Newsletter

Subscribe for exclusive tips, tutorials, and updates on music production. Stay ahead in your musical journey!