Having thought carefully, I really can't imagine any scenario in practical audio operations where it would matter if someone confused gain and level. If anyone can think of such a situation, then I'd love to know. But it doesn't hurt to have these things clear in one's mind, so here is a simple statement that should help...
Gain=change in level
So a signal has a certain level, whether it be sound pressure, voltage or digits. If you do something that changes the level, you have applied gain. So if the level of a signal is -26 dBFS and you apply 6 dB of gain, the signal level rises to -20 dBFS.
The word 'gain' of course implies more of something. Like 'profit' means more money. The opposite of 'profit' is 'loss'. The opposite of 'gain' is 'attenuation'. So if we want to make a signal lower in level, then we have to apply an attenuation. If the level of a signal is -6 dBFS and you apply 12 dB of attenuation, the signal level drops to -18 dBFS. With the magic of negative numbers, which have been with us for more than 2000 years now, we can indeed talk about negative gain just as easily as attenuation. So once again if the level of a signal is -6 dBFS and you apply -12 dB of gain, the signal level drops to -18 dBFS.
But...
In electronic audio, there is a way of thinking that positive gain is provided by active devices - devices that take electricity from a power source and use it to boost the signal. Level in a downwards direction - attenuation - can be controlled by passive devices that need no power source - a couple of resistors will do nicely.
So an electronic engineer may think in terms of controlling gain with active devices and controlling level with a passive device such as a fader.
But how can a fader provide +10 dB of gain at the top of its scale? Simple - by actively applying that 10 dB of gain before the fader. When the fader is set to 0 dB, it attenuates the already-boosted signal by 10 dB.
And...
I do feel a mild sense of irritation when, for example, I see a 'gain reduction' meter on a compressor. It should be 'level reduction' or 'attenuation'. Or it could just be labeled 'gain' and calibrated in negative values of decibels.
At the end of the day however it isn't that much to worry about in practical audio operations. Just keep in mind that 'gain=change in level' and you'll be fine!
“It isn't about equipment and software -
In the studio, you can work at whatever pace you like. But in live sound, or live broadcast, sometimes you have to think very fast indeed. Read more...
Too much master processing can really spoil a mix. So how can you keep it to a minimum? Read more...
Get caught downloading illegally and you could be made to pay anything up to $80,000 per track in compensation. But when record companies sell songs without permission or payment to the writers, they only have to cough up $157. Read more...
You'll never get a good recording of a drum set if the cymbals sound bad. But how you be sure to get a perfect cymbal sound every time? Read more...
Everyone knows that you should compress the snare and kick drum. But why should you do it, and how should you do it? Read more...
Anyone with a home recording studio now has the means to create a hit. So why haven't you yet? Read more...
I never thought I'd see synchronized singing and hula hooping, but I have now. And it demonstrates an interesting scientific principle that relates closely to audio. Read more...
Apple's new OS Mountain Lion apparently has more than 200 new features and you need 20 pages of tutorial to understand them. In what way is this a good thing? Read more...
If you have an old-style mixing console and you're suffering from noise, there's a reason for that. Read more...
The world-famous Abbey Road studio complex has been in the news lately. But not here. We'd rather record there than spread more tittle-tattle. Read more...
This might seem like an odd question, but what do you mean by 'sound'? Read more...
Some things about Apple's iPad are great. Some things are, er, missing. But how useful is it in the studio right now? Read more...
If you believe the Internet, you will believe that without a megabucks vocal mic, your recordings will be as rotten as rotten tomatoes. But here is proof that the Internet is wrong... Read more...
Clipping is an eternal problem in audio. It causes terrible distortion and cannot be corrected. Here is the VERY BEST tool to prevent you getting a clip ever again... Read more...
When you asked your singer to perform the second chorus differently, did you explain why? Oh dear, now you're stuck with it. Read more...
The Rupert Neve Designs Portico 517 preamplifier/DI can blend microphone and instrument signals. Why would you want to do this in the preamp? Read more...
I have a fantastic preamp and it makes all my vocals sound big and fat. I wonder if I should have an equally great power amp as well, so that everything I monitor sounds HUGE! Read more...
As the new James Bond movie Skyfall opens, it seems an appropriate time to revisit the question of whether the 'James Bond Theme' was actually written by Monty Norman or John Barry. Read more...
It's a rare bass guitar recording that doesn't vary in level to some extent. In most cases, this adds nothing to the musicality of the recording and just makes the track harder to mix. Read more...
You want to write a song that makes loads of money, right? Well people are really going to have to love it. So how can you do that? Read more...
Getting the music done is one thing, getting the artwork finished is another. But what about all the other information a CD needs?
Classical music just needs to be recorded, doesn't it? Well in some cases it really can be produced.
Can an $89 pair of monitors really be an effective tool in the recording studio? Or are they only good for 'media creation?
A wrong note that has resonated for more than half a century is fixed - without the aid of a time machine.
An RP reader finds that a certain combination of microphone and preamp works much better than he expected...
Anyone with a home recording studio now has the means to create a hit. So why haven't you yet?
What sounds good to the electric guitar player doesn't necessarily sound good to the audience. A live sound engineer explains...
So you're setting yourself up in the voice over business. What should you think about before anything else?
Amazingly, the answer to this question is - almost - yes!
If you're miking one of the finest violinists in the world, should you point the mic at the double bass instead?
An RP reader fears losing cabinet resonances if the backline of his band is miked up through the PA. But perhaps it is innovation in live sound that has been lost over the years.
Any theatre would have tielines from the stage to the sound control booth. But from one side of the booth's window to the other?
A major producer has 'stolen' a song from a pair of unknowns. A crime, or normal everyday life in the music business?
AKG makes some of the best mics in the world. AKG also makes a USB mic. A great USB mic?
Two singers, one microphone. Could it cause an Internet sensation?
If a tree falls in the woods, does it make a sound (if no-one is around to hear it?) If you can't hear hum, then is there no hum?
Are you planning on getting your tracks mastered? Then the first rule of preparation is not to master the tracks yourself.
You can get a plug-in to emulate virtually any analog audio process these days. But what about hum? Where's the plug-in for that?
Take a 300-year old bass line, a cello player with just seven days' experience, and some highly uncool-looking musicians... and make a recording that is really top of the pops for weird!
Sometimes unusual microphone placements can capture an interesting sound. In this instance, the sound is completely wrong.