If you read the comments of pro mix engineers whenever you can (and you should) you will often find that they like to optimize individual tracks in the context of the whole mix. So, for example, you would EQ a guitar track while the whole mix is playing. You wouldn't solo the track because whatever you did to it, you wouldn't know whether it would work for the benefit of the whole mix.
But you sometimes have to take what mix engineers say a little less than literally. They might be expert at mixing, but can you also expect them to be expert in explaining what they do? Try explaining to an octo-tentacled space alien how you walk on just two legs. Explaining what you do by instinct is often difficult, sometimes impossible.
Let's suppose however that today you have a song to mix and you decide not to use the solo buttons at all. You throw up the faders and, with levels, EQ, compression and reverb, you refine and hone, hone and refine, refine and hone, until the mix is perfect.
Well done! You have created a mix where each individual track was processed in the correct context.
But...
I would have to ask the question, "In the correct context of what?"
If you adjust everything in the context of the whole mix, then you have started with the context of an amorphous blob of audio. And then you EQed the guitar (for instance) in the context of that amorphous blob. Then you EQed something else, then something else. Basically you're going round in circles chasing a moving target. Gradually you are hoping that things will pull together and you will have a passably correct context in which to judge and adjust individual tracks. Don't worry - you'll get there in the end.
There are many ways to mix, and if the process I have described gets you to a good result, then that's fine. At the end of the day, if your mix sounds good, then it is good.
I would contend however that there is a better approach to mixing, and I suspect that the really great mix engineers do this by instinct, even if they don't realize it.
In any song, there will be certain components that are the most important. It may be the vocal, or in a more dance-orientated track it might be the combination of kick drum and bass instrument.
Whatever you choose as the most important element of your song, you should solo it and do whatever you need to to make it the most fantastic-est, exciting-est, wow-wow-wow-est it can possibly be. Make it so great that anyone hearing it for the first time will buy your record in an instant, without even hearing the rest of the instruments. OK, that's an impossible thing to happen, but it should be your aim.
When you have done that, you have your context and you can blend in the other instruments to suit the one you have selected as most important. From this point in the mix, no soloing should be necessary.
In summary, I will definitely say that there is no one correct way to mix. However it is always correct to have a plan of action. Different plans for different tracks, perhaps different plans for different days. The plan I have just outlined is a good one.
“It isn't about equipment and software -
You are about to update software that is vital to your business. But you have a backup of your boot disk, so if it goes wrong you think you are safe. Well think again! Read more...
A RecordProducer.com reader just happens to have a mixer standing around doing nothing. But he could use it as a preamp, couldn't he? Read more...
Your recordings need to sound professional right from the first millisecond. Four audio examples demonstrate this VERY clearly. Read more...
Have you ever wondered why there is a silvery patch inside a vacuum tube? Is it there for a purpose? Does it affect the sound of the tube? Read more...
Your work may be technically proficient. But other people can be technically proficient, but more creative. Who is going to win over the client and get the job? Read more...
Sometimes the snare is loud, sometimes it's not so loud. Should you use a compressor to even out the level? Read more...
I was able act as sound engineer, producer, session player and mastering engineer for this project.... Read more...
An RP reader has a turntable and a mixing console. But they are not sounding good together... Read more...
Sore throat today - maybe a throat infection tomorrow. How to end this painful cycle. Read more...
Is it a must to work with Pro Tools or could I survive with Logic in the professional environment? Should I learn Pro Tools even if I use Logic? Read more...
Some microphone and instrument preamplifiers have a variable impedance selector. What kind of difference will it make to your sound? What are you missing if you don't have it? Read more...
I'm not satisfied with the sound I am getting from acoustic guitars, either in the studio or on stage. Can you help? Read more...
I'm working with sonar producer 7. I plan on building a new machine this summer and upgrading to the new sonar.... Read more...
The sign of a good company is when they help out their customers when things go wrong. Here's an example... Read more...
The microphone used by Dusty Springfield on many of her hit records is up for sale. Vintage tube AKG C12 microphones don't come up for sale very often. This could be your big chance! Read more...
Could anyone check out your work without being told who it is by and know within seconds that it is yours? Read more...
You don't need years of music theory training to write for an orchestra. If the sounds are in your head, technology can get them out. Read more...
Mackie's Onyx Blackjack might just be the cutest audio interface around. So why would you want something just because it's cute? Read more...
What do you need to know to earn a living by recording music? Who will pay for your music? How should you market your music? How much can you earn? Read more...
Can an $89 pair of monitors really be an effective tool in the recording studio? Or are they only good for 'media creation?
A wrong note that has resonated for more than half a century is fixed - without the aid of a time machine.
An RP reader finds that a certain combination of microphone and preamp works much better than he expected...
Anyone with a home recording studio now has the means to create a hit. So why haven't you yet?
What sounds good to the electric guitar player doesn't necessarily sound good to the audience. A live sound engineer explains...
So you're setting yourself up in the voice over business. What should you think about before anything else?
Amazingly, the answer to this question is - almost - yes!
If you're miking one of the finest violinists in the world, should you point the mic at the double bass instead?
An RP reader fears losing cabinet resonances if the backline of his band is miked up through the PA. But perhaps it is innovation in live sound that has been lost over the years.
Any theatre would have tielines from the stage to the sound control booth. But from one side of the booth's window to the other?
A major producer has 'stolen' a song from a pair of unknowns. A crime, or normal everyday life in the music business?
AKG makes some of the best mics in the world. AKG also makes a USB mic. A great USB mic?
Two singers, one microphone. Could it cause an Internet sensation?
If a tree falls in the woods, does it make a sound (if no-one is around to hear it?) If you can't hear hum, then is there no hum?
Are you planning on getting your tracks mastered? Then the first rule of preparation is not to master the tracks yourself.
You can get a plug-in to emulate virtually any analog audio process these days. But what about hum? Where's the plug-in for that?
Take a 300-year old bass line, a cello player with just seven days' experience, and some highly uncool-looking musicians... and make a recording that is really top of the pops for weird!
Sometimes unusual microphone placements can capture an interesting sound. In this instance, the sound is completely wrong.
Clicks occur for all kinds of reasons - imprecise editing, random noises, gremlin infestation. But when do you need to do something about them?
There are so many decisions to be made during the process of recording. Should you make them one at a time as you go along, or let them pile up so that you have a mass of decisions to make in the mix?
Earlier discussion on this topic...
Joseph, Lakewood Nj, USA
This is what I start with. It the grove of the song and what's being said that makes people buy the song. So I start with the drums, bass and one other sound that will stand out in a song. Make that the best is can be. Next making the main vocals and the background vocals the best it can be and this it why... If I can not understand what your saying why have vocals.
Now make the drums, bass and that one other sound hit you in your face, then I bring up the main vocals just above the drums, bass and that one other sound to tell the story and next add the background vocals to inforce what being said in the story.
Then add all the other insterments to flow with of the grove and the story. After the mix is done for that song I walk away from it for a 2 - 3 days and when I come back I put it on a CD and take a nice drive with fresh ears to listen to everything and what every dose not set well with me I change it till itâs right.
I will never over do the effects that I add to each part in the song so that when mastering is done they can put that sweet touch to the song to make everything popâ¦
All that to say, learn to understand what the song is saying in every part, how everything flows and most of all donât over do anything and be yourself as you learn from others who have been mixing for years. Not every song will ever be like another song⦠so no mix will be like another mix⦠so learn and enjoy your mix as you keep it simple with wisdom and do your best. Iâm just sayingâ¦
Friday July 06, 2012
Mr B, Joburg, South Africa
I think it all makes sense and has the same meaning even though it's explained differrently, the important thing is to understand and to get the whole point. I've learnt something and i'll definately try it out on my next mix and i'll give you guys feedback..
Thanx
Tuesday June 26, 2012
Gerard Abraham, Port Of Spain, Trinidad And Tobago
I just get a good balance without clipping then optimize the whole mix, wondering if normalizing after optimizing is recommended
Monday June 25, 2012
Arnaud, Challonges, France
That's a cool paper. But I think there is no receipe - it depends so much on what you call the "context". I'm used to mix very crowded material, mainly metal music, and the first thing you have to keep in mind when starting a mix is : "clean that shit up !" I spend a long time listening to the solo tracks and EQing just to cut the stuff that may be painful for the ears - if you want to reach something intense, it doesn't have to be tiring. Then, when it is done, I build the tone of the mix around the most proeminent part of it (often the drums, starting with the room and ambience mics). I don't know if a lot of people do the same, nevermind. It works and when people are satisfied with the final result, I know I was right right.
Monday June 25, 2012
Kevin Doyle, Toronto, Canada
Well I start with the vocal and build from there. The I process each instrument to enhance the role they play in the song. There rare basically 3 roles; harmonic, melodic and/or rhythmic. Mixing as stated above is not rocket science just musical common sense!
Sunday June 24, 2012
Araam, Stockport, UK
You could solo each track, listen carefully first then throw your faders up and start balancing.
Saturday June 23, 2012
Neil Porter, Wollongong, Australia
I confess I have become weary of attending sessions, as a co-producer or similar, in which the mix starts with a 'wonderful', exciting, humungous, earthquake kick. Then bass, then snare and so on. And, yes, I've seen the lead vocal left until last and no real attention given to it at all. It's much worse when that's live and not studio.
Friday June 22, 2012
Martin Zuther, Germany
Some (very experienced) recording engineers record their tracks with EQ and sometimes even compressor, so the mixing engineers start with much more than the basic tracks.
If you've ever seen a video of George Martin who by simply adjusting the volume faders gets a perfect mix, you know what I mean.
Friday June 22, 2012
Al Pratt, Niterói,, Brazil
Believe it or not, I start with the vocal and the "soundstage" creating the ambience that I think fits the lyrics and the spirit of the song, then I add the drums and bass and build from there.
Friday June 22, 2012
Antonio Carlos Coimbra, Santo Andre, Portugal
I like to start with the drums, bass and main vocal. The rest will be easy if the back bone of the song is well mixed. Sometimes I use the solo or the mute buttons. I agree that it makes sense to start with the main instrument of the song and build the rest of the mix around it. It makes sense to use whatever you have available to optimize things further. If the final mix sounds great that's what matters. The solo and mute buttons exist for a reazon...
Thursday June 21, 2012
Jim B, Derry, Ireland
makes good sense to me doing it like that
Thursday June 21, 2012
Rasmus
Not using the solo buttons? That's fine, I'll just use the mutes. :D
Thursday June 21, 2012
Bernie, St. John\'s, Canada
I am by no means an expert at mixing or evening recording. However, what you have said makes sense to me..The most important elements of the song should be optimized for the best possible sound and then everything else should be mixed in around that...
Thursday June 21, 2012