A question from a RecordProducer.com reader...
"I bought a Behringer condenser microphone. The interesting thing is that it has this USB cable instead of the normal three pin microphone cable. What's your opinion on microphones that use USB cables rather than the normal one?"
Let me play god's advocate (I guess that's the opposite of devil's advocate) and set out the case for USB microphones as opposed to the conventional type that connects through an XLR cable.
The potential advantage of a USB microphone is that it can right a number of wrongs that have been around for far too long.
Firstly there is something inherently wrong in a capacitor microphone having an internal preamplifier (which they all must as the signal from the capsule is too weak to travel through more than a meter or so of cable), then having another preamplifier at the end of the cable.
Why two preamplifiers? Why doesn't the microphone just have one preamplifier mounted internally, thus giving it a robust line level output? The answer is 'historical reasons', which modern technology can now do without.
Think about the conventional microphone preamplifier. No, you have thought about it too much already! People waste eons of time worrying about their microphone preamplifier and whether it is good enough. And if it is good enough they worry about whether it is the right one for their mic.
With USB microphones, the conventional microphone preamplifier is placed where it ought to be - inside the microphone! Not only is this a better place because it's physically closer to the diaphragm, it also gives the manufacturer the opportunity to optimize the preamplifier exactly for the microphone.
If you're not convinced that this is the right thing to do, then consider this... You spend a lot of time worrying about your preamplifier. Why don't you spend just as much time worrying about your microphones' internal preamps? They are just as important, and arguably more so.
So the USB microphone takes the microphone preamplifier and puts it where it belongs, inside the microphone. Are there any other advantages?
Well yes, the signal chain doesn't stop at the preamplifier. Next comes the analog-to-digital converter.
Assume a conventional microphone but with a line-level output. The signal, although robust, has to travel through meters, perhaps many meters, of cable before it meets the converter. Wouldn't it make more sense to put the converter inside the microphone too, so that the microphone has a digital output? Once again you wouldn't have to worry about converters because the microphone's manufacturer has done all that for you.
In a world populated with USB microphones, you would choose the best-sounding microphone for the particular job in hand. And since it has an internal preamp and converter, you can be sure that the digital output is a perfect representation of the electronic signal created right there in the microphone's capsule, which is surely what you would want it to be.
OK, I'll stop being god's advocate now. Surely there must be some problems with this...
Well one problem is the lack of choice since USB microphones are few in number. Well a little bit of industry could solve that.
Another problem is that the gain control, which was once on the microphone preamplifier, must now be on the microphone. That could easily be fixed with a common standard for remote gain control. Bear in mind however that to do this properly requires relay switching in the mic. I can guarantee this will be an issue if USB mics ever really take off.
Perhaps the most significant problem however is that USB is here today, but it will without doubt be gone tomorrow. Would you spend, say, $1000 on a high-class USB mic, and feel confident that you could still find a USB socket to plug it into in five years' time?
In conclusion therefore, I see no reason why microphones should not have internal preamplifiers boosting the signal to line level, and internal analog-to-digital converters too. (To be picky, line level might not be necessary in such a circumstance, but it is part a development from conventional mics to line level mics to digital output mics.)
Setting a standard for connection that will last as long as the XLR connector has lasted will definitely be the tricky part of all of this. Other than that however, the USB mics of today could be pointing a route to the future.
What do you think?
P.S. The mic pictured is an Audio Technica AT2020 USB.
“It isn't about equipment and software -
Apple's new OS Mountain Lion apparently has more than 200 new features and you need 20 pages of tutorial to understand them. In what way is this a good thing? Read more...
JamHub is billed as 'the silent rehearsal studio'. Whatever it is, there's simply nothing else like it. Read more...
Gain... Level... Are you confused? And does it make any difference if you are? Read more...
What is it about your studio that makes it look and feel like a recording studio, and a nice place to work? Or is it just another room in your house? Read more...
I have a fantastic preamp and it makes all my vocals sound big and fat. I wonder if I should have an equally great power amp as well, so that everything I monitor sounds HUGE! Read more...
Hi everybody, this song is part of an album which will be out soon.... Read more...
What product doesn't exist today that we could really make use of in the studio? A remote controlled microphone stand of course! Read more...
Why have loudspeakers that fire sound at you when you can have loudspeakers that spray sound all around the room. Those crazy Swedes... :-) Read more...
Avid has just released Version 9 of their famous Pro Tools software. But if you're thinking of upgrading, then maybe you should think again. Read more...
This might seem like an odd question, but what do you mean by 'sound'? Read more...
Would you describe how equalization, compression and effects were used through the decades? I have heard producer Mark Ronson talking about his job with Amy Winehouse and he was saying that in the sixties the tendency was to use a lot of reverb, and that is the sound he brought to the Back to Black album. I'm really curious about the evolution of sound tendencies in music. Read more...
It is an accepted fact of audio life that a decent quality loudspeaker must have at least two drive units. But this only has one. Is it because it's old? Read more...
You'll never get a good recording of a drum set if the cymbals sound bad. But how you be sure to get a perfect cymbal sound every time? Read more...
I recorded a vocal track and it sounds thin and nasal. Is there a way to fix this? How do I make a vocal track sound warmer and thicker? Read more...
David Mellor argues that knowing how to position a microphone can make a far bigger difference to the quality of your work than which microphone you choose. Read more...
Many a great record has been made using only 24 tracks. But how can you expand a 24-track recorder to 25, 26 tracks or even more? Read more...
If you're miking one of the finest violinists in the world, should you point the mic at the double bass instead? Read more...
Or does it? Can clever mic technique and audio processing really improve the sound of an instrument? Read more...
A RecordProducer.com reader asks, "What if you are using a Behringer B1 microphone. How can you bring the best out of it?" Read more...
The ADK A-48 Vintage Valve microphone features no fewer than nine polar patterns. Is this overkill, or the ultimate in fine tuning? Read more...
A wrong note that has resonated for more than half a century is fixed - without the aid of a time machine.
An RP reader finds that a certain combination of microphone and preamp works much better than he expected...
Anyone with a home recording studio now has the means to create a hit. So why haven't you yet?
What sounds good to the electric guitar player doesn't necessarily sound good to the audience. A live sound engineer explains...
So you're setting yourself up in the voice over business. What should you think about before anything else?
Amazingly, the answer to this question is - almost - yes!
If you're miking one of the finest violinists in the world, should you point the mic at the double bass instead?
An RP reader fears losing cabinet resonances if the backline of his band is miked up through the PA. But perhaps it is innovation in live sound that has been lost over the years.
Any theatre would have tielines from the stage to the sound control booth. But from one side of the booth's window to the other?
A major producer has 'stolen' a song from a pair of unknowns. A crime, or normal everyday life in the music business?
AKG makes some of the best mics in the world. AKG also makes a USB mic. A great USB mic?
Two singers, one microphone. Could it cause an Internet sensation?
If a tree falls in the woods, does it make a sound (if no-one is around to hear it?) If you can't hear hum, then is there no hum?
Are you planning on getting your tracks mastered? Then the first rule of preparation is not to master the tracks yourself.
You can get a plug-in to emulate virtually any analog audio process these days. But what about hum? Where's the plug-in for that?
Take a 300-year old bass line, a cello player with just seven days' experience, and some highly uncool-looking musicians... and make a recording that is really top of the pops for weird!
Sometimes unusual microphone placements can capture an interesting sound. In this instance, the sound is completely wrong.
Clicks occur for all kinds of reasons - imprecise editing, random noises, gremlin infestation. But when do you need to do something about them?
There are so many decisions to be made during the process of recording. Should you make them one at a time as you go along, or let them pile up so that you have a mass of decisions to make in the mix?
Audio production - it's all about the DAW isn't it? Well that's what marketers would have you believe.
Earlier discussion on this topic...
Clint Millett, Calgary, Canada
One problem that I see is that there is a cable length limit for USB devices, which is approximately 15 feet. Beyond this length, you need to insert a hub which will allow another 15 feet. So, your computer or whatever you are plugging into needs to be within 30 feet of the microphone. The USB specification allows only 3 hubs in a circuit, but as most computers have a hub built into them, it is hit or miss if you can go to 45 feet of cable length. Another problem is that a 7 port hub, is actually two 4 port hubs, with one 4 port hub being fed from the other. There are devices out there that will allow extended USB cable lengths, but they aren't cheap. It seems to me that this is just putting a bandaid on a bleeding artery. There will be problems with both of the above cable stretching methods. In the long run, until something beter comes along that will allow much longer cable lengths, I can't see USB microphones being usefull for live events, professional studios, or even the larger home studios.
Thursday November 10, 2011
Derek Wiltshire, Swansea, Wales
Am currently using both a Sure SM58 and a Blue Yeti (USB) on a radio show and we way prefer the Yeti to the Sure and it's cheaper. The only down side we have at the moment is that the Yeti is possibly too sensitive so may just drop the Sure SM58. The other possible problem is that with entry level USB mikes, the chips aren't serialised so very often you can only run one of a particular type ie: Blue Yeti (original) at a time in any single PC.
Thursday November 10, 2011