Here's a protip for life in general - worry about the things that make a difference, don't worry about things that don't. Another - You'll die if you worry, and die if you don't. So just get on with life and stop worrying.
We get a lot of inquiries here at RP Towers from people with worries. The usual worry is that they don't have the right equipment. Sometimes they are justified - plugging a microphone into an interface with only line inputs is never going to lead to success. But no-one knows these things automatically so we are happy to help.
But quite often we find that people are worrying about things that don't really make any difference. We take it that anyone who follows RecordProducer.com and Audio Masterclass is primarily interested in making music and/or recordings of a professional standard. And by 'professional standard' we mean a quality that will satisfy a typical industry client, or sell into the market.
So let's have a look at the 16-bit to 24-bit conversion issue. Is it an issue at all really?
The first thing to consider is the significance of each of the bits. Those sixteen bits are used to quantify the voltage level of an analog signal in digital terms, in 65,536 steps (2 to the power 16).
So if at any instant the digital signal is at 1001010001101011 then that is a digital description of the instantaneous level of an analog voltage. In digital terms, the left-most 1 or 0 is the most significant bit. The right-most 1 or 0 is the least significant bit. Going from left to right, the signal is described with greater and greater accuracy, or you could say in finer and finer detail.
Sixteen bits are sufficient to describe a signal with a dynamic range of 96 decibels from its loudest to its quietest parts. (In real life it's a little less, but we'll stick with the theory.)
96 decibels is a HUGE dynamic range. Play some music really loud through your monitors. Now reduce the level by 96 dB. What can you hear? Nothing. Or as near to nothing as makes hardly any difference.
When a 16-bit signal is imported into a 24-bit session, all that happens is that eight more bits are added to the right of the previously least significant bit. In this case, they should all be zeroes as the 16-bit signal has no information here.
But what about dither?
Ah, there just has to be a complication....
One problem with digital audio is quantization distortion at very low levels. It sounds nasty and it is something to be concerned about. The way it is dealt with is to add a little dither noise right at the end of the recording chain. This eliminates the distortion and although adding noise sounds like a bad thing, it isn't - it's totally good. You will almost certainly have a plug-in for it.
So what difference would it make whether or not your 16-bit files were dithered?
Well if they are undithered what will happen is that quantization distortion will remain in the lower levels of the 16-bit signal.
If your 16-bit files are dithered, then all should be fine. Unless of course your DAW's import function adds dither without you knowing about it, in which case you have dithered twice so your signal is now noisier than it ought to have been.
The question is of course, do you know whether your 16-bit files are dithered? If they sound free from distortion at very low levels, they probably are. And if you can't hear any quantization distortion, well it doesn't really make much difference.
Dither is something that people can often get really worried about. Ideally you wouldn't add any yourself at all and leave it to the mastering engineer.
But why not explore dither for yourself - play around with some very low level audio -70 or -80 and below. Switch dither in and out; try different types of dither. When you hear what it does for yourself, you will be in a good position to make decisions.
In summary, if you need to import 16-bit files into a 24-bit session, just go ahead and do it. Listen closely - if they sound like they need dither then add it (at the 16-bit level). If they don't, then just leave them be. Why worry?
“It isn't about equipment and software -
It is often thought that you should master a mix so that it sounds as loud as possible. But for some markets, this could ruin your chances of selling your music. Read more...
Think you know your Neumann microphones? Well think again. And be prepared to go green (with envy?) Read more...
I am a singer songwriter and producer of my own material. Hardware/Software:- Cubase 3SX, Yamaha 01X DAW controller/MLAN Firewire card, Sontronics Helios Microphone...... Read more...
Setting the gain of the microphone preamplifier correctly is one of the basic skills of audio. So why don't mic preamps need meters? Read more...
The compressor is a great studio tool. But does it work for live sound? Is there a hidden danger that will keep the engineer on his toes? Read more...
Take a trio of rhythm guitar, bass and drums. Add a vocal, add some overdubs. Oh, and someone find a lead guitarist for the solo... Read more...
If this is an electric guitar, then it's an odd one. But perhaps it isn't a guitar at all... Read more...
An RP reader finds that a certain combination of microphone and preamp works much better than he expected... Read more...
Capacitor microphones used to come each with their own power supply. Then phantom power was invented so that any number of mics can be powered from the mixing console. So why are some manufacturers returning to the old ways? Read more...
All live sound mixing consoles have pan controls. But there are very good reasons not to use them. Not if you respect your audience, that is. Read more...
We used to be in love with MIDI. But you hardly hear of it these days. Has it gone away, or is it just keeping quiet? Read more...
You can make each individual track of your recording sound as great as you like. But will they all mix together successfully? Read more...
Conventional wisdom says that soundproofing materials need to be heavy and thick. So how can curtains be expected to provide any degree of soundproofing at all? Read more...
Some people talk about soundproofing, others about sound isolation. But which is correct? And what about sound insulation - is that correct too? Read more...
A RecordProducer.com reader is having live sound problems and wonders if an expander might help. Read more...
A wrong note that has resonated for more than half a century is fixed - without the aid of a time machine. Read more...
This one was written back when I was 21 or so and has been recorded a few times on various media. In this case, the bed tracks were recorded on a friend's mac laptop using i presume garageband in 2003 I think.... Read more...
A RecordProducer.com reader has a dust problem. But is it really a problem or can you live with it? Read more...
Put four converters to the test, in a pro studio with pro testers. See which one comes out best. Or is the result a foregone conclusion? Read more...
An Audio Masterclass visitor asks why stereo is better than mono. But is that always the case? Read more...
Can an $89 pair of monitors really be an effective tool in the recording studio? Or are they only good for 'media creation?
A wrong note that has resonated for more than half a century is fixed - without the aid of a time machine.
An RP reader finds that a certain combination of microphone and preamp works much better than he expected...
Anyone with a home recording studio now has the means to create a hit. So why haven't you yet?
What sounds good to the electric guitar player doesn't necessarily sound good to the audience. A live sound engineer explains...
So you're setting yourself up in the voice over business. What should you think about before anything else?
Amazingly, the answer to this question is - almost - yes!
If you're miking one of the finest violinists in the world, should you point the mic at the double bass instead?
An RP reader fears losing cabinet resonances if the backline of his band is miked up through the PA. But perhaps it is innovation in live sound that has been lost over the years.
Any theatre would have tielines from the stage to the sound control booth. But from one side of the booth's window to the other?
A major producer has 'stolen' a song from a pair of unknowns. A crime, or normal everyday life in the music business?
AKG makes some of the best mics in the world. AKG also makes a USB mic. A great USB mic?
Two singers, one microphone. Could it cause an Internet sensation?
If a tree falls in the woods, does it make a sound (if no-one is around to hear it?) If you can't hear hum, then is there no hum?
Are you planning on getting your tracks mastered? Then the first rule of preparation is not to master the tracks yourself.
You can get a plug-in to emulate virtually any analog audio process these days. But what about hum? Where's the plug-in for that?
Take a 300-year old bass line, a cello player with just seven days' experience, and some highly uncool-looking musicians... and make a recording that is really top of the pops for weird!
Sometimes unusual microphone placements can capture an interesting sound. In this instance, the sound is completely wrong.
Clicks occur for all kinds of reasons - imprecise editing, random noises, gremlin infestation. But when do you need to do something about them?
There are so many decisions to be made during the process of recording. Should you make them one at a time as you go along, or let them pile up so that you have a mass of decisions to make in the mix?
Earlier discussion on this topic...
Henry Moss, Athens Ga, United States
Okay so you add dither when going from 16 bit to 24 bit.. But what if you're going the other way? I always find my 24 by 48 khz files getting distorted when I turn them into 16 bit mp3's. There are these unsavory sounding air pockets (that's my term for it) that show up where it sounds like you can literally hear that data has been sucked out of the original track. Will dither help this?
Wednesday March 30, 2011