The most likely place you will find bad sound is in amateur theatrical productions - school plays, children's dance shows and the like, so I'm not actually talking about professional sound. Even so, it doesn't hurt to aspire to professionalism in my view. I'll give you an example...
I was watching a ballet show performed by youngsters of all ages to an audience of 1000+. Every time the compere came on they would either speak into a silent microphone, ask if the mic was on, blow into the mic or tap it. That's bad sound.
There are two elements of professionalism in this context. One is to pull the fader down when the mic isn't in use. An open mic in a live show is an open invitation for profanity of some kind to reach innocent ears. Like mine.
The second is that if you are the sound operator, then you should know that when someone walks up to the mic, or comes on stage, mic in hand, you have to be ready to push that fader up at a moment's notice, or no notice at all.
If the sound operator doesn't realise that this is an absolutely top priority, way above gasbagging to the other technical crew on the intercom, then they are not doing their job properly. This applies whether or not they are being paid.
Any sound professional would of course recognise the importance of this. Any sound non-professional will wonder whether it's really all that important.
But what is most important for anyone who seeks professionalism in sound, for themselves or from the crew they work with, is that people need to CARE about sound. When that happens - truly happens - everything else will start to fall into place.
Well that's the moral. But what about the poor compere? The compere of the show should be able to talk into the microphone at any time, without having to test it, and be CERTAIN that it is going to work. Without that confidence, the show is going to be a pretty rough ride for everyone.
P.S. Since writing the above I attended a school music concert that demonstrated my point amply. Apart from some guitars and the announcement mic, the concert was unamplified. One of the teachers acted as compere and made a dozen or so announcements during the course of the evening. On not one occasion was the mic live when she started to speak. Several times she checked the switch on the mic and finally she gave up using the mic altogether. Apart from that, the concert was a delight. It's a shame that the worst feature of the show had to be the sound.
“It isn't about equipment and software -
As the march towards computerized digital audio equipment continues, surely analog equipment will eventually lie dead, buried, forgotten... Read more...
A RecordProducer.com reader who is a live sound engineer has a compressor, and he is determined to use it. Is this a good idea? Read more...
Anyone with a home recording studio now has the means to create a hit. So why haven't you yet? Read more...
Can you tell me the difference between a demo and a master, in terms of what they are used for and how they should sound? Read more...
In theory, digital audio is more accurate than vinyl records. But in many cases you will hear the artist's and producer's intentions much more accurately on vinyl than you will on CD or download. Read more...
Do you think your studio is big enough to fit all of your sound in? You might be surprised to learn just how BIG sound can be... Read more...
Lower latency, better CPU load balancing, reduced memory usage, better disk performance... Something to look forward to? Read more...
Everyone should build a loudspeaker at least once in their life. But for this would-be loudspeaker builder, their first attempt was something of a disaster... Read more...
When you're dead, you're dead. What a fantastic opportunity for people to start rifling though your life! Read more...
Look at any decent mixing console and you will see high-pass filters in each and every mic preamp section. Why is this, and what are they used for? Read more...
The Auto-Tune debate is unlikely to go away. Those who can, sing. Those who can't use Auto-Tune. Read more...
You've tried all the usual microphones and are tired of their sound? Why not try something that is really over the edge... Read more...
The mastering loudness war is not yet over, yet the casualties are piling up. Yet here is convincing proof that it is all so wrong... Read more...
Your market doesn't listen on loudspeakers that are anywhere near as good as your studio monitors. And their headphones may be even worse... Read more...
It's a topic of endless debate, but really there is no way a stream of digits can beat the real vinyl experience. Read more...
One of the most enduring myths in recording has been the endless quest for more and more tracks, which grew exponentially from the real need to overdub in the 60's. Prior to 4 track, overdubs were made by compiling sounds from one machine to another - with a generation loss of sonics every time... Read more...
If you're miking one of the finest violinists in the world, should you point the mic at the double bass instead? Read more...
Soon, if a kindergarten in Germany wants their little kiddies to sing songs that are in copyright, they will have to pay for a license. Is there no end to the greed of the record companies? (Or is the story slightly different to what it's made out to be?) Read more...
Any noise that is present in your multitrack recording will probably be unnoticeable until the end of the song. But when the instruments fade away, noise might become embarrassingly audible. Read more...
Getting the music done is one thing, getting the artwork finished is another. But what about all the other information a CD needs?
Classical music just needs to be recorded, doesn't it? Well in some cases it really can be produced.
Can an $89 pair of monitors really be an effective tool in the recording studio? Or are they only good for 'media creation?
A wrong note that has resonated for more than half a century is fixed - without the aid of a time machine.
An RP reader finds that a certain combination of microphone and preamp works much better than he expected...
Anyone with a home recording studio now has the means to create a hit. So why haven't you yet?
What sounds good to the electric guitar player doesn't necessarily sound good to the audience. A live sound engineer explains...
So you're setting yourself up in the voice over business. What should you think about before anything else?
Amazingly, the answer to this question is - almost - yes!
If you're miking one of the finest violinists in the world, should you point the mic at the double bass instead?
An RP reader fears losing cabinet resonances if the backline of his band is miked up through the PA. But perhaps it is innovation in live sound that has been lost over the years.
Any theatre would have tielines from the stage to the sound control booth. But from one side of the booth's window to the other?
A major producer has 'stolen' a song from a pair of unknowns. A crime, or normal everyday life in the music business?
AKG makes some of the best mics in the world. AKG also makes a USB mic. A great USB mic?
Two singers, one microphone. Could it cause an Internet sensation?
If a tree falls in the woods, does it make a sound (if no-one is around to hear it?) If you can't hear hum, then is there no hum?
Are you planning on getting your tracks mastered? Then the first rule of preparation is not to master the tracks yourself.
You can get a plug-in to emulate virtually any analog audio process these days. But what about hum? Where's the plug-in for that?
Take a 300-year old bass line, a cello player with just seven days' experience, and some highly uncool-looking musicians... and make a recording that is really top of the pops for weird!
Sometimes unusual microphone placements can capture an interesting sound. In this instance, the sound is completely wrong.