Working in live sound can encompass venues of all sizes from a small and intimate bar all the way up to the biggest sports stadium seating 100,000 or more.
So is there a way to calculate how much power you need to fill the venue with sound?
Firstly, we need to be a little more precise about this. "Fill the venue with sound" needs quantifying. One way to do this would be to say that the system should be capable of a level of 100 dB SPL over the whole seating area of the venue. Or a map of levels could be produced that allows some areas to be louder than others.
So now let's consider the variables in the system...
Let's say that you have 1000 watts of power available. This will be supplied to loudspeakers that have a certain efficiency rating. If a loudspeaker can convert 1000 watts of electrical power to 20 watts of sound power, it is doing pretty well at 2% efficiency. The rest of the energy is wasted as heat.
So now we have 20 watts of sound power to play with. All loudspeakers focus their output to a greater or lesser extent. The more focused the output, the higher the level in the direction of 'throw'.
Now for the difficult part - reflections from the room...
Any room (in acoustics, 'room' means an enclosed space of any size) holds and contains sound energy to an extent. A reverberant room will allow sound energy to bounce back and forth. A well-damped room will absorb sound energy. The reverberant room will be louder for the same sound power input because you get the opportunity to hear the same sound several times as it bounces back and forth.
Plainly, we are talking about some difficult calculations here. But there is an alternative... good old-fashioned 'rule of thumb'!
I don't think you will find a better rule of thumb than that provided by the experts at Crown Audio who collectively probably have at least as much and possibly more experience than anyone else in providing amplification for venues of varying sizes, and for different purposes.
So here it is...
Crown also provide a calculator, but this does not account for the directional properties of the loudspeakers, nor for reflections in the room. Still, it makes for a good starting point. (You could bear in mind that they want to sell you more amplifiers!)
Opinions from live sound practitioners would be welcome.
“It isn't about equipment and software -
I started in 2004 just writing songs for myself and other people. When hearing from others what I wrote the lyrics really inspired me to perform myself that's when I started recording my own music 2007.... Read more...
An 8-channel preamp of apparently SSL/Neve quality is up for sale on Ebay. But can you really trust the seller's description? Read more...
An RP reader asks, "I wish to cover some songs I am sure will have copyright. Do I need to seek permission from the owner/creator or do I just do it and then pay a royalty on copies sold." Read more...
Whoever designs microphones clearly thinks that they all should be microphone-shaped. But isn't it about time we had something more appropriate to the way we use them? Read more...
A reader asks whether it is allowable to pan low frequency instruments. If not, what would the possible penalty be? Read more...
Audio production - it's all about the DAW isn't it? Well that's what marketers would have you believe. Read more...
A RecordProducer.com reader is having live sound problems and wonders if an expander might help. Read more...
The ear and brain pay much more attention to high-level sounds than low. So if you can bring up the low levels you might find a new source of excitement in your audio. Read more...
A good musical arrangement can make all the difference to the presentation of a song. Of course, it helps if it's a good song in the first place... Read more...
In the future, microphones won't be like the microphones we use today. We won't have to hook them up to a preamplifier. Whoa this is heavy... Read more...
An RP reader wants to capture his hihat in high fidelity. So what is the right mic for the job? Read more...
We're all for cutting costs where it doesn't compromise performance, but can office dividers do a good job in the recording studio? Read more...
If you never have problems with your DAW, you're in a tiny minority. But using the right DAW could make life much easier. Read more...
A RecordProducer.com reader wants to take advantage of the wonderful warm sound of analog tape. But he doesn't know what it sounds like. Read more...
While the iPad might be something less than a computer, it is definitely something more than many of the other computer-like devices in our lives. Read more...
An RP reader has an interesting phase problem. Is this something he should worry about? Read more...
The mastering loudness war is not yet over, yet the casualties are piling up. Yet here is convincing proof that it is all so wrong... Read more...
Lower latency, better CPU load balancing, reduced memory usage, better disk performance... Something to look forward to? Read more...
A pro recording studio for £135 a day (around $200 USD), with access to just about any exotic gear you could possibly want - could this possibly be true? Read more...
It is often thought that you should master a mix so that it sounds as loud as possible. But for some markets, this could ruin your chances of selling your music. Read more...
Getting the music done is one thing, getting the artwork finished is another. But what about all the other information a CD needs?
Classical music just needs to be recorded, doesn't it? Well in some cases it really can be produced.
Can an $89 pair of monitors really be an effective tool in the recording studio? Or are they only good for 'media creation?
A wrong note that has resonated for more than half a century is fixed - without the aid of a time machine.
An RP reader finds that a certain combination of microphone and preamp works much better than he expected...
Anyone with a home recording studio now has the means to create a hit. So why haven't you yet?
What sounds good to the electric guitar player doesn't necessarily sound good to the audience. A live sound engineer explains...
So you're setting yourself up in the voice over business. What should you think about before anything else?
Amazingly, the answer to this question is - almost - yes!
If you're miking one of the finest violinists in the world, should you point the mic at the double bass instead?
An RP reader fears losing cabinet resonances if the backline of his band is miked up through the PA. But perhaps it is innovation in live sound that has been lost over the years.
Any theatre would have tielines from the stage to the sound control booth. But from one side of the booth's window to the other?
A major producer has 'stolen' a song from a pair of unknowns. A crime, or normal everyday life in the music business?
AKG makes some of the best mics in the world. AKG also makes a USB mic. A great USB mic?
Two singers, one microphone. Could it cause an Internet sensation?
If a tree falls in the woods, does it make a sound (if no-one is around to hear it?) If you can't hear hum, then is there no hum?
Are you planning on getting your tracks mastered? Then the first rule of preparation is not to master the tracks yourself.
You can get a plug-in to emulate virtually any analog audio process these days. But what about hum? Where's the plug-in for that?
Take a 300-year old bass line, a cello player with just seven days' experience, and some highly uncool-looking musicians... and make a recording that is really top of the pops for weird!
Sometimes unusual microphone placements can capture an interesting sound. In this instance, the sound is completely wrong.
Earlier discussion on this topic...
Brian Masiello, Cts, Boston, Ma, USA
Sorry for the late reply, but I only discovered your website recently. There are some great articles and very useful information! In regard to providing proper amplifier power ratings for a venue, please bear in mind that many sound system designers and installers will want to provide an amplifier that is slightly more powerful than the associated loudspeaker can handle. Here's why. Overdriving an amplifier will produce an output signal that is distorted. If you were to view this on an oscilloscope, you would see that this distorted signal appears like a square wave. The motion of a loudspeaker's cone will resemble the signal sent from the amplifier's output. For example, feeding a sine wave to a loudspeaker allows the loudspeaker's cone to move back and forth smoothly. But when fed a square wave, the cone protrudes out, holds there slightly, then pushes in, holds there slightly, repeat, so on and so forth. This puts quite a strain on the loudspeaker, and there is no better way to shorten the loudspeaker's lifespan than by feeding it a square wave. Therefore, it is advisable to provide an amplifier that will deliver the acceptable power level "cleanly" to the loudspeaker. Keep in mind that the amplifier does not need to be cranked up. Also, while Crown's recommendations may be a good starting point, when selecting an amplifier, it is even better if you can start by defining your goal (similar to their first two recommendations). Ask yourself, "what is maximum sound pressure level (SPL dB) that I will want to deliver to my audience?". By gathering the loudspeaker efficiency, listener distance, and my SPL goal, I can quickly calculate the amplifier power rating required (of course, bear in mind that this is a "quick check" and other factors, such as room acoustics, should also be considered for more precise calculations).
Monday September 19, 2011
Fleeltygralse, Puerto Galera, Philippines
be happy and love. kiss
Sunday May 08, 2011