Watch someone setting up a microphone for an instrument (other than a singer). They will raise the boom to higher than head height, then point the microphone down at the instrument.
OK, lets examine the logic in this. Perhaps...
Honestly, it isn't hard to get as cynical as this if you just practice a little every day ;-)
I am very much in favor of people placing mics as they feel is best, but I can't help getting the feeling that they do this because that's what they have seen, and then of course perpetuate the myth.
Let's start from first principles. The average distance from the ground of the human ear is somewhere around 160-170 centimeters, give or take. Acoustic instruments have without exception been designed to sound good to the human ear, so why ever place the mic higher than that?
Then consider that people most often enjoy music from a seated position, so the height of the ear falls to around 140 cm. (4 feet 6 inches for the metrically challenged), so there is a good case to make that a mic should never be placed higher than this.
Try it! I guarantee that the mic will look ridiculously low. But that's where people listen from, so could all those people be wrong?
Yes, that's it! What we really need is to bring listening into line with microphone technique and give people a box to stand on so they can 'listen down' on an instrument the same way that mics do!
So next time you set a mic on an acoustic instrument, ask yourself whether you are aping microphone technique you have seen elsewhere? Or have you thought for yourself? More important...
Have you experimented for yourself?
“It isn't about equipment and software -
In theory, a microphone that doesn't need phantom power should just ignore it. So why are ribbon microphones supposedly so sensitive? Read more...
A question asked by a RecordProducer.com reader - "I wanted to know is there any special way to record a piano or do I just need a good mic and put it up to the piano?" Read more...
I would like to know if Audio Masterclass Course Director David Mellor ever does any live training, or is Audio Masterclass purely distance learning? Read more...
There are so many notes in a sonata or a concerto. Should we expect them all to be played correctly? Or is the occasional wrong note acceptable in the context of a performance of wonderful musicality? Read more...
An RP reader asks, "I want to know the best filters for mastering. I want to know the best EQ." Read more...
Written any great songs lately? Did they need a massive production with hundreds of tracks to sound good? Then they are not great songs. Read more...
To achieve success in music, you don't necessarily have to be able to sing all that well. Here's proof... Read more...
Your work may be technically proficient. But other people can be technically proficient, but more creative. Who is going to win over the client and get the job? Read more...
We think we know everything these days. But are we getting a little too clever? Perhaps people in an earlier age of recording knew something that we don't. Read more...
From a grunt to a scream, can a compressor even out all the varying levels of a vocal? Read more...
A RecordProducer.com reader wants to know which compressor is best, and for a bonus answer wants to know which equalizer too. The answer may be surprising... Read more...
A RecordProducer.com reader just happens to have a mixer standing around doing nothing. But he could use it as a preamp, couldn't he? Read more...
A 26 year old song has been banned from Canadian radio. Canadians are now protected from hearing an offensive word (three times in the same verse!) Read more...
Push your levels too high and you will break the bounds of your system's capability. But will a limiter make things any better, or simply act as another source of distortion? Read more...
I run a live sound system. There is too much monitor sound leaking into front-of-house. What can I do? Read more...
We're all for cutting costs where it doesn't compromise performance, but can office dividers do a good job in the recording studio? Read more...
There are so many decisions to be made during the process of recording. Should you make them one at a time as you go along, or let them pile up so that you have a mass of decisions to make in the mix? Read more...
A RecordProducer.com reader has a control he doesn't know what to do with. Does it really do anything? Read more...
Sore throat today - maybe a throat infection tomorrow. How to end this painful cycle. Read more...
Get caught downloading illegally and you could be made to pay anything up to $80,000 per track in compensation. But when record companies sell songs without permission or payment to the writers, they only have to cough up $157. Read more...
Can an $89 pair of monitors really be an effective tool in the recording studio? Or are they only good for 'media creation?
A wrong note that has resonated for more than half a century is fixed - without the aid of a time machine.
An RP reader finds that a certain combination of microphone and preamp works much better than he expected...
Anyone with a home recording studio now has the means to create a hit. So why haven't you yet?
What sounds good to the electric guitar player doesn't necessarily sound good to the audience. A live sound engineer explains...
So you're setting yourself up in the voice over business. What should you think about before anything else?
Amazingly, the answer to this question is - almost - yes!
If you're miking one of the finest violinists in the world, should you point the mic at the double bass instead?
An RP reader fears losing cabinet resonances if the backline of his band is miked up through the PA. But perhaps it is innovation in live sound that has been lost over the years.
Any theatre would have tielines from the stage to the sound control booth. But from one side of the booth's window to the other?
A major producer has 'stolen' a song from a pair of unknowns. A crime, or normal everyday life in the music business?
AKG makes some of the best mics in the world. AKG also makes a USB mic. A great USB mic?
Two singers, one microphone. Could it cause an Internet sensation?
If a tree falls in the woods, does it make a sound (if no-one is around to hear it?) If you can't hear hum, then is there no hum?
Are you planning on getting your tracks mastered? Then the first rule of preparation is not to master the tracks yourself.
You can get a plug-in to emulate virtually any analog audio process these days. But what about hum? Where's the plug-in for that?
Take a 300-year old bass line, a cello player with just seven days' experience, and some highly uncool-looking musicians... and make a recording that is really top of the pops for weird!
Sometimes unusual microphone placements can capture an interesting sound. In this instance, the sound is completely wrong.
Clicks occur for all kinds of reasons - imprecise editing, random noises, gremlin infestation. But when do you need to do something about them?
There are so many decisions to be made during the process of recording. Should you make them one at a time as you go along, or let them pile up so that you have a mass of decisions to make in the mix?
Earlier discussion on this topic...
Devon, Vienna, Austria
To John and Anthony, boom mics on a film or video set are pointed downward from overhead not for any sonic advantage, but simply to keep the mic out of frame. So there is one good reason for doing it even though it may not be the first choice sonically. Drum overheads are up high enough not to get bashed by a stick, and it is the best vantage to get the whole kit most evenly. Vocals should be recorded from slightly above ( just a few inches) but pointed downward at the mouth, NOT to force the singer in the correct position (shelter Studios) but originally to let the wind blasts shoot below the mic instead of into the grill causing "pops" and other problems. A windscreen stops the pops of course, but in exchange for a tiny shade of high end air. Though sometimes a windsceen is used to intentionally subtract a bit up there, so nothings a no no. Still, that slight angle from just above the mouth has an added advantage of keeping the nasal sinus sound to a minimum and also aims a bit more toward the body where there is some useful resonance. Interestingly I got a better snare sound miking from the side, but toms (and snare for many) are miked from above to get the drum tone at a close distance. However distance miking may sound indeed better at ear level. We all (except for drummers) hear the kit from the front and not from overhead. So, some are exceptions to the rule, some have sonic and mechanichal advantages (singers) and some just plain gotta be out of the way, dammning the sonic implications. So a rule is a good start, and the artist in you should know when they need to be broken.
Monday October 31, 2011
John, Texas, USA
Actualy, there is a logic for raising the mic and pointing it downwards. I have worked in many auditoriums where ignorant HVAC contractors have placed vents over or near the stage. A cardoid mic pointed down, while the stand is raised can help to reduce the vent noises to a degree. Of coarse you need to use good noise reduction software in post.
Tuesday February 22, 2011
Nurredin, Las Vegas, USA
I do the opposite. I lower it and point it up! Am I wrong? it works for me!
Tuesday February 22, 2011
Girlfish
The same thing happens with the piano, people place the mics inside the piano, next to the strings. I don't get it, that doesn't sound natural. The mic should go a little bit far from it, I want to listen to the pianist fingers and feet, that's the real sound. I've tried it, nothing beats the natural takes and placing the mic always as it is a person works.
Wednesday May 12, 2010
Shelter Studios, Schaffhausen, Switzerland
The original reason for applying this technique was to force a singer to hold their head in such a way as to allow a relaxed and optimum operation of the Larynx. Of course most "experts" have misunderstood the intent, attributing it to reflections, moon phases etc. The reason for boom mics on film and video sets is that it is aesthetically displeasing to have a microphone in view on the film and usually difficult to account for i.e. in the middle of films like Gladiator. The boom operator will always take dialogue from above since that delivers the best results for the centre channel delivery in the cinema and prevents the actors and film crew from treading on the mic. Rarely the mic will be placed below the shot but that is not the norm.
Wednesday April 14, 2010
Anthony Linden Jones, Kurrajong, Nsw, Australia
I think (John) the intention is to capture the same sound that arrives at your ears, and there is a lot of validity to that. However, if we take this to be a new formulaic approach to replace an old formulaic approach the results won't always be perfect. As John articulates, there will be circumstances where a better sound might be arrived at from a higher mic position. The best place to put the microphone in any recording situation is where it sounds good to your ear. You can't hope to pick up a good sound with the mic in a 'bad' place, but what sounds good or bad depends on the instrument/voice, the player, the style, and personal taste.
Monday April 05, 2010
John, Portsmouth, Va, U.s.a.
In spaces of less than acoustic perfection, aiming the mic down helps to reduce outside noise on the recording (providing the floor is not acousticaly reflective). Have you ever seen a mic boom in a video studio. The unidirectional mic is held over the actor to prevent noise from outside the microphones pick up radius. A listener doesn't really need to be in line with the mic. The listener will never even see the mic. Speaker placement would be logical in line with the listener's ears. If you place the mic up side down, the music will not be upside down. Ultimately, mic placement depends on the proximity to floor and ceiling and walls, the instrument, and the musician.
Monday March 29, 2010