The End of Analogue - Is analogue multitrack recording dead? (part 2)
I dont think anyone is in serious doubt anymore that digital recording is better than analogue. Some people will say that analogue has its own special sound which is certainly true. These people probably also prefer vinyl records to CD and black and white television to colour.
I dont think anyone is in serious doubt anymore that digital recording
is better than analogue. Some people will say that analogue has its own special
sound which is certainly true. These people probably also prefer vinyl records
to CD and black and white television to colour. I would say that while it would
be nice to have these old sounds available in an effects rack (along with the
gritty distortion of optical sound on film), it is not appropriate - unless
you specialise in the musical styles of a bygone era - to apply them to everything
you record. 16 bit digital audio is a much more transparent information channel,
even if its not perfect yet. By the way, if you want to see how bad some
digital convertors are, record a sine wave tone onto your DAT and slowly reduce
the level to zero. Now play the tape back, and as the tone diminishes, increase
the monitor level to compensate. If the convertors are good then you will hear
a noise building up which is smooth and even in character. On cheaper machines
the noise will be harsh and gritty - not very nice at all. If the sine wave
itself starts to become harsh then the convertors are not as linear as they
ought to be. Youll probably hate digital after you try this!
Even when working at its best, 16 bit recording is not always ideal. One day,
digital recording will be 24 bit and very close to being absolutely linear (free
of distortion within the 24 bit limit). When that day arrives well probably
rediscover analogue and apply all the techniques learnt along the way to create
an even greater argument! For now, 16 bit digital audio is considered perfectly
good enough for domestic stereo listening providing all the bits are used. But
16 bits are not quite good enough for mixing to stereo in the studio because
you have no margin of error - its virtually impossible to get full value
out of that very last bit and drive the signal all the way up to 1111111111111111
without going over the top at all. 16 bit multitrack is definitely not good
enough because each time you double the number of tracks you mix together the
noise goes up by a theoretical 3dB. This means that sixteen tracks of 16 bit
recording will mix together to give the equivalent of 14 bits, in the worst
case situation. The signal to noise ratio of the mix would in theory be 82dB
rather than the 96dB (in theory once again) of each individual track. So to
be compatible with 16 bit stereo standards, a sixteen track digital multitrack
machine should record to 18 bit resolution.
It should be evident that sound quality-wise, digital recording is not perfect.
But even so, I would still confirm my absolute certainty that its a damn
sight better than any current analogue format other than Dolby SR noise reduction
used on machinery of a full professional standard. This last option can give
16 bit digital a fright, but only at a very considerable cost. As I shall be
pointing out shortly, a digital multitrack recorder with A to D and D to A convertors
of reasonable quality such as the Alesis ADAT is easily superior in sound quality
to narrow gauge analogue machines such as the Fostex G and Tascam MSR models.
Its not the fault of the analogue machines or their designers, its
just the way things are.
“It isn't about equipment and software -
it's all about knowing how to use it”
Should you optimize tracks individually or in the context of the whole mix?
You can make each individual track of your recording sound as great as you like. But will they all mix together successfully? Read more...
Conquer clipping, once and for all
Clipping is an eternal problem in audio. It causes terrible distortion and cannot be corrected. Here is the VERY BEST tool to prevent you getting a clip ever again... Read more...
Our last word on the iPad! For now...
Some things about Apple's iPad are great. Some things are, er, missing. But how useful is it in the studio right now? Read more...
Q: I am recording someone else's song. Do I have to pay them a royalty?
An RP reader asks, "I wish to cover some songs I am sure will have copyright. Do I need to seek permission from the owner/creator or do I just do it and then pay a royalty on copies sold." Read more...
Q: How do I connect my subwoofers to my mixer?
How do I connect my powered subs ( I think my powered subs already have a built-in crossover) to my mixer? Through the auxiliary or main output? Read more...
Q: How can I get my music up to a level that is acceptable for radio?
How can I get my music up to a level that is acceptable for radio? My music always seems to be a few decibels lower than the accepted level. Read more...
Can a compressor correct vocals that are at different levels?
From a grunt to a scream, can a compressor even out all the varying levels of a vocal? Read more...
What qualities do you need to be a producer?
A RecordProducer.com reader asks what personal qualities he needs to become a producer. There are four key areas where you will need to be a genius to succeed, maybe five... Read more...
When to use delay on vocals
Delay is a useful technique for enhancing all sorts of signals. But when should you use it on vocals, and when should you not? Read more...
Why vinyl really can get closer to the original studio sound than digital
In theory, digital audio is more accurate than vinyl records. But in many cases you will hear the artist's and producer's intentions much more accurately on vinyl than you will on CD or download. Read more...
Mixing: Where to start? - The most important instrument?
Although the vocal is often the most important component of a song, sometimes it is another instrument that provides the 'hook' that compels people to buy. Perhaps that is where you should start mixing? Read more...
Q: How can I get the 'recorded' sound in my live shows?
An RP reader asks, "In a crowded place, when we play an audio CD through the PA system, most of the time it sounds great because the audio is probably highly compressed. But when we play live music with our band through the same PA system, it sounds dull, no matter how much we equalize. My question is: Is it possible to find a compressor that will allow us to obtain the same punch in a live concert situation?" Read more...
"Stand By Me " by New Genre Ent.
I own a small personal recording studio in where my group/ label records all of our own songs. I record my team, and using adobe audition 3.0 i mix and master each of our songs.... Read more...
How to edit out pops in speech or singing
Microphone pops are an unpleasant side effect of recording. It's best to avoid them in the first place, but what if someone sends you a poppy vocal recording to fix? Read more...
An interesting phase problem in drum overheads
Using microphones in a stereo pair always raises a good question - are you SURE they sound right? Read more...
How to pan an acoustic piano
Should the bass notes be on the left and the high notes on the right, or the other way round? Read more...
Microphones - will we always hook them up to a preamplifier?
In the future, microphones won't be like the microphones we use today. We won't have to hook them up to a preamplifier. Whoa this is heavy... Read more...
It's true! Vinyl IS better than digital!!
It's a topic of endless debate, but really there is no way a stream of digits can beat the real vinyl experience. Read more...
Does the polar pattern of your microphone matter?
Your mic might be cardioid, omnidirectional, figure-of-eight or hypercardioid, but what difference will it make to your recording? Read more...
Can a $1599 microphone match up to an undisputed classic? Hear it for yourself...
For many engineers, the Neumann U47 is the undisputed champion of microphones. Here you can judge it against the $1599 Lauten Audio Atlantis. You might be in for a surprise. Read more...