The End of Analogue - Is analogue multitrack recording dead? (part 2)
I dont think anyone is in serious doubt anymore that digital recording is better than analogue. Some people will say that analogue has its own special sound which is certainly true. These people probably also prefer vinyl records to CD and black and white television to colour.
I dont think anyone is in serious doubt anymore that digital recording
is better than analogue. Some people will say that analogue has its own special
sound which is certainly true. These people probably also prefer vinyl records
to CD and black and white television to colour. I would say that while it would
be nice to have these old sounds available in an effects rack (along with the
gritty distortion of optical sound on film), it is not appropriate - unless
you specialise in the musical styles of a bygone era - to apply them to everything
you record. 16 bit digital audio is a much more transparent information channel,
even if its not perfect yet. By the way, if you want to see how bad some
digital convertors are, record a sine wave tone onto your DAT and slowly reduce
the level to zero. Now play the tape back, and as the tone diminishes, increase
the monitor level to compensate. If the convertors are good then you will hear
a noise building up which is smooth and even in character. On cheaper machines
the noise will be harsh and gritty - not very nice at all. If the sine wave
itself starts to become harsh then the convertors are not as linear as they
ought to be. Youll probably hate digital after you try this!
Even when working at its best, 16 bit recording is not always ideal. One day,
digital recording will be 24 bit and very close to being absolutely linear (free
of distortion within the 24 bit limit). When that day arrives well probably
rediscover analogue and apply all the techniques learnt along the way to create
an even greater argument! For now, 16 bit digital audio is considered perfectly
good enough for domestic stereo listening providing all the bits are used. But
16 bits are not quite good enough for mixing to stereo in the studio because
you have no margin of error - its virtually impossible to get full value
out of that very last bit and drive the signal all the way up to 1111111111111111
without going over the top at all. 16 bit multitrack is definitely not good
enough because each time you double the number of tracks you mix together the
noise goes up by a theoretical 3dB. This means that sixteen tracks of 16 bit
recording will mix together to give the equivalent of 14 bits, in the worst
case situation. The signal to noise ratio of the mix would in theory be 82dB
rather than the 96dB (in theory once again) of each individual track. So to
be compatible with 16 bit stereo standards, a sixteen track digital multitrack
machine should record to 18 bit resolution.
It should be evident that sound quality-wise, digital recording is not perfect.
But even so, I would still confirm my absolute certainty that its a damn
sight better than any current analogue format other than Dolby SR noise reduction
used on machinery of a full professional standard. This last option can give
16 bit digital a fright, but only at a very considerable cost. As I shall be
pointing out shortly, a digital multitrack recorder with A to D and D to A convertors
of reasonable quality such as the Alesis ADAT is easily superior in sound quality
to narrow gauge analogue machines such as the Fostex G and Tascam MSR models.
Its not the fault of the analogue machines or their designers, its
just the way things are.
Q: How should I set the gain make-up control on my compressor?
A RecordProducer.com reader has a control he doesn't know what to do with. Does it really do anything? Read more...
What is your main concern if your interest is voice over?
So you're setting yourself up in the voice over business. What should you think about before anything else? Read more...
One song, arranged four ways
A good musical arrangement can make all the difference to the presentation of a song. Of course, it helps if it's a good song in the first place... Read more...
$8.70 for a single download? How on earth do they get away with those prices?
A record label specializing in high quality audio charges $$$ for its tracks. But will you get good value for your money? Read more...
Should vocals be recorded in mono or stereo?
When stereo sounds so much better and more lifelike than mono, why would you ever want to record a vocal with a single mic? Read more...
"(Treat her) Like A Lady" by Son of Man
I am a singer songwriter and producer of my own material. Hardware/Software:- Cubase 3SX, Yamaha 01X DAW controller/MLAN Firewire card, Sontronics Helios Microphone...... Read more...
Do some microphones respond to EQ better than others?
Conventional recording wisdom says that you should choose the mic that sounds right in itself, rather than expecting EQ to solve any problems. But do some mics work better with EQ than others? Read more...
Q: Should I record at 44.1 kHz or 96 kHz?
There seem to be a lot of different sample rates in digital audio. I would like to know how to choose which sample rate to record at. Read more...
Q: What is groove in MIDI?
A Record-Producer.com reader asks a simple but interesting question. Musicians can groove, but can MIDI groove too? Read more...
The iPad - it's really quite mediocre
It was supposed to be a magical and revolutionary device. But now that it's here, it is plain that it really isn't anything special at all. Read more...
How to get the best out of any microphone
A RecordProducer.com reader asks, "What if you are using a Behringer B1 microphone. How can you bring the best out of it?" Read more...
Q: What key should I sing in?
A RecordProducer.com reader has a deep, deep voice. Should he sing in the key of Z for success? Read more...
Setting the recording level control in GarageBand
Several Audio Masterclass students have used Apple's GarageBand DAW and achieved excellent results. However, GarageBand's recording level control can be confusing. Other DAWs don't have one. Read more...
Q: How can I can I tune my mixer to get a better recording?
It seems that a RecordProducer.com reader's mixer is out of tune. Or is he building a hot rod? Read more...
To eliminate feedback is it good to reduce the gain and raise the fader? (Part 2)
An RP reader has feedback problems. But will clever manipulation of the gain control and fader provide the cure? In Part 2 of this two-part article, we look at the relationship between these two controls. Read more...
What is FLAC? Is it more than a waste of FLACCING time?
There are more audio formats than you could possibly shake a stick at. But could you find a use for FLAC in your recording process? We think you could. Read more...
Avid's new upgrades - great for mere 'content production'
Content can be art. Art can be content. But when content is just a commodity, there is surely something going wrong. Read more...
The Beatles original audition tape - is it a fake?
The tape that got The Beatles rejected by Decca Records in 1962 has unexpectedly been rediscovered. But is it just a (money-making) fake? Read more...
"Reggae Superstar-Mr.Perfect" by King Salla Records
Soloman 'King Salla Records' Dacosta was born in Claremont St.Ann was raised however in St.Mary.... Read more...
Famous concert pianist plays a wrong note!
There are so many notes in a sonata or a concerto. Should we expect them all to be played correctly? Or is the occasional wrong note acceptable in the context of a performance of wonderful musicality? Read more...