The End of Analogue - Is analogue multitrack recording dead? (part 2)

The End of Analogue - Is analogue multitrack recording dead? (part 2)

I don’t think anyone is in serious doubt anymore that digital recording is better than analogue. Some people will say that analogue has its own special sound which is certainly true. These people probably also prefer vinyl records to CD and black and white television to colour.

Audio Masterclass

Digital Advantages

I don’t think anyone is in serious doubt anymore that digital recording is better than analogue. Some people will say that analogue has its own special sound which is certainly true. These people probably also prefer vinyl records to CD and black and white television to colour. I would say that while it would be nice to have these old sounds available in an effects rack (along with the gritty distortion of optical sound on film), it is not appropriate - unless you specialise in the musical styles of a bygone era - to apply them to everything you record. 16 bit digital audio is a much more transparent information channel, even if it’s not perfect yet. By the way, if you want to see how bad some digital convertors are, record a sine wave tone onto your DAT and slowly reduce the level to zero. Now play the tape back, and as the tone diminishes, increase the monitor level to compensate. If the convertors are good then you will hear a noise building up which is smooth and even in character. On cheaper machines the noise will be harsh and gritty - not very nice at all. If the sine wave itself starts to become harsh then the convertors are not as linear as they ought to be. You’ll probably hate digital after you try this!

Even when working at its best, 16 bit recording is not always ideal. One day, digital recording will be 24 bit and very close to being absolutely linear (free of distortion within the 24 bit limit). When that day arrives we’ll probably rediscover analogue and apply all the techniques learnt along the way to create an even greater argument! For now, 16 bit digital audio is considered perfectly good enough for domestic stereo listening providing all the bits are used. But 16 bits are not quite good enough for mixing to stereo in the studio because you have no margin of error - it’s virtually impossible to get full value out of that very last bit and drive the signal all the way up to 1111111111111111 without going over the top at all. 16 bit multitrack is definitely not good enough because each time you double the number of tracks you mix together the noise goes up by a theoretical 3dB. This means that sixteen tracks of 16 bit recording will mix together to give the equivalent of 14 bits, in the worst case situation. The signal to noise ratio of the mix would in theory be 82dB rather than the 96dB (in theory once again) of each individual track. So to be compatible with 16 bit stereo standards, a sixteen track digital multitrack machine should record to 18 bit resolution.

It should be evident that sound quality-wise, digital recording is not perfect. But even so, I would still confirm my absolute certainty that it’s a damn sight better than any current analogue format other than Dolby SR noise reduction used on machinery of a full professional standard. This last option can give 16 bit digital a fright, but only at a very considerable cost. As I shall be pointing out shortly, a digital multitrack recorder with A to D and D to A convertors of reasonable quality such as the Alesis ADAT is easily superior in sound quality to narrow gauge analogue machines such as the Fostex G and Tascam MSR models. It’s not the fault of the analogue machines or their designers, it’s just the way things are.

Publication date: Tuesday February 07, 2006
Author: David Mellor

 

 

FREE 12-STAGE COURSE TOUR - Learn how Audio Masterclass can help you become a
better producer and engineer in your own home recording studio!

The Audio Masterclass 12-stage free video tour

 

 

Earlier discussion on this topic...

sarbpal gurm, ludhiana, india

hello sir,

i am going to start my own digital audio recording studio very soon.for this i am looking for used machines in excellent condition.if you can help me in this field than please contact me.

thanks.

yours sincerely,

sarbpal gurm
Tuesday July 11, 2006

Johnny, London, UK

Exactly Antony, I doubt David Mellor (who i presume wrote this) has properly used analog tape anyway.

As you say, the preferred capture format for most top producers and artists is still 2 inch. This is no coincidence.

George Martin / Quincy Jones / Al Schmitt - Good ear

David Mellor - Full of hot air.
Sunday April 30, 2006

antony, new york, US

"I don’t think anyone is in serious doubt anymore that digital recording is better than analogue."

I think that is a rather bold statement to make, considering that 95% of topselling artists still use 2" tape for their recordings even today... Analogue will never be bettered by digital recording. we hear in analogue, and our ears will always tell us the truth.

The question is, have you got a good ear or a bad ear.

George martin/Quincy jones/ Al Scmit = good ear

Whoever wrote that = bad ear
Tuesday February 07, 2006