The End of Analogue - Is analogue multitrack recording dead? (part 2)
I dont think anyone is in serious doubt anymore that digital recording is better than analogue. Some people will say that analogue has its own special sound which is certainly true. These people probably also prefer vinyl records to CD and black and white television to colour.
I dont think anyone is in serious doubt anymore that digital recording
is better than analogue. Some people will say that analogue has its own special
sound which is certainly true. These people probably also prefer vinyl records
to CD and black and white television to colour. I would say that while it would
be nice to have these old sounds available in an effects rack (along with the
gritty distortion of optical sound on film), it is not appropriate - unless
you specialise in the musical styles of a bygone era - to apply them to everything
you record. 16 bit digital audio is a much more transparent information channel,
even if its not perfect yet. By the way, if you want to see how bad some
digital convertors are, record a sine wave tone onto your DAT and slowly reduce
the level to zero. Now play the tape back, and as the tone diminishes, increase
the monitor level to compensate. If the convertors are good then you will hear
a noise building up which is smooth and even in character. On cheaper machines
the noise will be harsh and gritty - not very nice at all. If the sine wave
itself starts to become harsh then the convertors are not as linear as they
ought to be. Youll probably hate digital after you try this!
Even when working at its best, 16 bit recording is not always ideal. One day,
digital recording will be 24 bit and very close to being absolutely linear (free
of distortion within the 24 bit limit). When that day arrives well probably
rediscover analogue and apply all the techniques learnt along the way to create
an even greater argument! For now, 16 bit digital audio is considered perfectly
good enough for domestic stereo listening providing all the bits are used. But
16 bits are not quite good enough for mixing to stereo in the studio because
you have no margin of error - its virtually impossible to get full value
out of that very last bit and drive the signal all the way up to 1111111111111111
without going over the top at all. 16 bit multitrack is definitely not good
enough because each time you double the number of tracks you mix together the
noise goes up by a theoretical 3dB. This means that sixteen tracks of 16 bit
recording will mix together to give the equivalent of 14 bits, in the worst
case situation. The signal to noise ratio of the mix would in theory be 82dB
rather than the 96dB (in theory once again) of each individual track. So to
be compatible with 16 bit stereo standards, a sixteen track digital multitrack
machine should record to 18 bit resolution.
It should be evident that sound quality-wise, digital recording is not perfect.
But even so, I would still confirm my absolute certainty that its a damn
sight better than any current analogue format other than Dolby SR noise reduction
used on machinery of a full professional standard. This last option can give
16 bit digital a fright, but only at a very considerable cost. As I shall be
pointing out shortly, a digital multitrack recorder with A to D and D to A convertors
of reasonable quality such as the Alesis ADAT is easily superior in sound quality
to narrow gauge analogue machines such as the Fostex G and Tascam MSR models.
Its not the fault of the analogue machines or their designers, its
just the way things are.
Does inverting the phase of one channel of a stereo signal always sound bad?
The two channels of a stereo signal need to be in phase with each other. But are there times when it doesn't matter? Read more...
How can a stereo pair of figure-of-eight microphones invert the phase of a signal?
About the figure-of-eight pattern, what does it mean 'inverted signal'? In terms of what? What does it mean 'out of phase'? Read more...
Why are the mics we use on guitar cabs so obviously the wrong shape?
Whoever designs microphones clearly thinks that they all should be microphone-shaped. But isn't it about time we had something more appropriate to the way we use them? Read more...
Can I send the output of my mixer to a compressor then bring the signal back to the mixer?
An RP reader has worked out an interesting way of connecting his compressor. Will it work? Or is something going to blow? Read more...
Q: Can I use a low-pass filter to remove noise from my recording?
An Audio Masterclass student has a problem with acoustic noise. Is it an acceptable solution to filter it out? Read more...
An interesting example of miking for TV
If you're recording in the studio, you can put your mics anywhere you like. But for TV, it's a little different... Read more...
Is your music beautiful? Is it exciting?
If your music is neither beautiful nor exciting, then it is unlikely to find an audience. We hear many recordings at Audio Masterclass that are professional. But mere professionalism isn't enough to get you noticed. A professional-sounding recording can be useful as an album filler, and even in the age of the download there are album-fillers aplenty being bashed out in pro studios. But to make an impact and achieve true success, your work needs to be beautiful. And if it isn't beautiful, then it needs to be exciting! Read more...
Q: What carpet do you recommend for a studio floor?
Leaving aside questions of color and pattern, what type of carpet works best in a recording studio environment? Read more...
How to insult a sound engineer [with video]
Sound engineers are normally a pretty thick-skinned bunch. So what is it that really riles them? Read more...
Avid's new upgrades - great for mere 'content production'
Content can be art. Art can be content. But when content is just a commodity, there is surely something going wrong. Read more...
The importance of monitoring in the recording studio
When you make recordings, you will be *monitoring*, not merely listening. Monitoring is vital to the recording process all the way from basic tracks through mixing, mastering and quality control of the finished product. Read more...
Why do some people use equipment that was designed when dinosaurs ruled the Earth?
Do you still use DAT? CD recorders? Outboard effects units? Come on and admit it - you're a dinosaur! Read more...
Choosing equipment? Here's how to make the right choice and not waste money.
You can spend a lot of money on equipment. You can WASTE a lot of money on equipment too. Here's how to simplify the decision-making process. Read more...
What is a pad? What is it used for?
In which situations would you use the -10 dB or the -20 dB pad? Recording live music? Read more...
Why mono is better than stereo (sometimes)
An Audio Masterclass visitor asks why stereo is better than mono. But is that always the case? Read more...
How to keep your studio business open by recognizing the client life cycle
If you have a studio business, doubtless you want it to continue for decades to come. But if you don't understand the client life cycle then you'll soon be in trouble. Read more...
A Neve mixing console with built-in turntable
If you're in the mood to add some vinyl scratches to your track, what could be better than having a turntable right there in your console? Read more...
Quadrant faders - will they make a comeback?
Early mixing consoles had quadrant faders instead of the linear faders of today. Do they just look pleasantly retro, or do they have advantages we have now lost? Read more...
Will.i.am is giving up music to learn computer programming
Many aspiring producers admire Will.i.am for his musical success. He admires Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg. Read more...